All words are wonders~

 

All words

seem paradoxical

in that words

are empty yet

seem to express 

a thought~

apparently the

wonder of words~~

the minimalist~~

 

the minimalist

decries clutter

wishing for less

perhaps nothing

a seeking goal

already

fulfilled~

Paradoxical~~

 

Paradoxical~

Nothing matters

Everything matters~

Without nothing 

nothing appears~

Nothing 

is the map and the territory

Nothing here or there~

No one appears 

in a story~

Nothing is doubtless

Nothing is beyond repair

Nothing lasts forever~

Nothing appearing to happen~~

 

Nothing

appears to happen

what more can be said~

anything more would be

Nothing appearing

to happen~as are

these words~~

Unchanging map of nothing~~

 

an appointment

seeming as a 

fork in a path

portending 

dark or light..

it is a lingering 

of time

so it seems

in an unchanging

map of nothing

which all of

these words 

express~~

unnamed and named~~

 

Appearance

of an unnamed bird

was named by

a birdbook suggesting

separation

from nature~or 

perhaps a new

naming

Appearance~~

Ahra Ahra

Well.. this cannot be known what is.

It might appear expressed or labeled as music, description, contemplation, awakening, falling asleep.. 

But, none of these labels actually mean anything nor describe the indescribable.

And whatever appears interpreted as, it's simply not the case and appears as all cases.

It's not something that can be distinguished, so therefore, this, is simply unknown, expressing. 

It's not expressing to anyone, for anyone, against anyone.

It's simply what is.

It has no remarks, no demands, no destination, and no distance whatsoever.

It's not a deliverance.

It's not a letter.

It's not an co-opting.

It's not a pursuing.

There's no one to be pursued.

So, by all means, questions arise :

"Who is this expressing to, and why?"

And all that's said, is all that's said.

And is that simple.

A flower doesn't get to be asked why she blooms, beyond all apparent romantic notions and philosophical inquiries, there's an obviousness of a flower, simply flowering, not being questioned. 

She does not ask why you assume separation in/as the starring and inquiry.

First of all, a flower doesn't know it flowers. 

And that's it.

Just simply that.

conventional beliefs~

 

Separation in 

its infinite guises

are conventionally

unquestioned~

no notice of the

immediacy and

emptiness of 

this assumption

seemingly

flagging the

conventional~~