Appearance
of an unnamed bird
was named by
a birdbook suggesting
separation
from nature~or
perhaps a new
naming
Appearance~~
Ahra Ahra
Well.. this cannot be known what is.
It might appear expressed or labeled as music, description, contemplation, awakening, falling asleep..
But, none of these labels actually mean anything nor describe the indescribable.
And whatever appears interpreted as, it's simply not the case and appears as all cases.
It's not something that can be distinguished, so therefore, this, is simply unknown, expressing.
It's not expressing to anyone, for anyone, against anyone.
It's simply what is.
It has no remarks, no demands, no destination, and no distance whatsoever.
It's not a deliverance.
It's not a letter.
It's not an co-opting.
It's not a pursuing.
There's no one to be pursued.
So, by all means, questions arise :
"Who is this expressing to, and why?"
And all that's said, is all that's said.
And is that simple.
A flower doesn't get to be asked why she blooms, beyond all apparent romantic notions and philosophical inquiries, there's an obviousness of a flower, simply flowering, not being questioned.
She does not ask why you assume separation in/as the starring and inquiry.
First of all, a flower doesn't know it flowers.
And that's it.
Just simply that.












